From: Vinzent Hoefler <JeLlyFish DOT software AT gmx DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Generate real-mode 386 DOS executables?
Followup-To: comp.lang.asm.x86
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 14:44:15 -0500
Organization: JeLlyFish software
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <g2vhva.cc6.ln@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <BQ2S9.280216$a8 DOT 123208 AT news4 DOT srv DOT hcvlny DOT cv DOT net> <3e18ff2f DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <avavsl$dpf6g$1 AT ID-175126 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <_yYS9.19409$jM5 DOT 53659 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <tcmhva DOT 6c4 DOT ln AT jellix DOT jlfencey DOT com> <1042054297 DOT 215872 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: firewall.mdc-dayton.com (12.161.103.180)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1042055114 14830097 12.161.103.180 (16 [175126])
X-Orig-Path: jellix.jlfencey.com!nobody
X-Homepage: http://jlfencey.com
X-Phone: +1-937-271-7158
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Martin Str|mberg wrote:

[Big Real Mode]
> Not quite. The problem is that as soon you restore a segment register
> in real mode its big real mode properties go poff.

No. The segment descriptor values go untouched in real mode. BTDT.

> The real problem is of course what this has to do with DJGPP?

Ok, so we should change to comp.lang.asm.x86 or end that discussion.

Follow-up is set, just in case.


Vinzent.

-- 
It may be bad manners to talk with your mouth full, but it isn't too
good either if you speak when your head is empty.