From: Martin Str|mberg Subject: Re: Generate real-mode 386 DOS executables? Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <3e18ff2f DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <_yYS9.19409$jM5 DOT 53659 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.5_BETA (alpha)) Message-ID: <1042054297.215872@queeg.ludd.luth.se> Cache-Post-Path: queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) Date: 08 Jan 2003 19:31:37 GMT Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: queeg.ludd.luth.se X-Trace: 1042054297 news.luth.se 26545 130.240.16.109 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Vinzent Hoefler wrote: : Ben Peddell wrote: : [32-Bit Real Mode] :> But be warned, as soon as you call something that switches to :> protected mode, Big Real Mode goes *poof*. : The main problem is, as soon as you call BIOS or something it goes : *poof* because the called code assumes a 16-bit-code-segment. So : probably the first timer/keyboard/harddisk/whatever interrupt would : already crash you. That's what I said. Not quite. The problem is that as soon you restore a segment register in real mode its big real mode properties go poff. If you're lucky you might have fs and gs untouched (mainly because of DOZE's 8086-ness). But e. g. FreeDOS kernel compiled for 386 or higher probably uses them, or any other 386-aware program might, so just forget about it. The real problem is of course what this has to do with DJGPP? Right, MartinS