Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 13:16:15 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <1659-Sat04Jan2003131615+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3e149a66$0$8311$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de> (bdeck@lycos.co.uk)
Subject: Re: sigaltstack
References:  <3e149a66$0$8311$9b622d9e AT news DOT freenet DOT de>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "deckerben" <bdeck AT lycos DOT co DOT uk>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:02:02 +0100
> 
> I asked the threads group about it and someone recommended pth. The version
> that seems to hold the best potential for a quick working port IMO is 1.1.6.
> But (at least this version) needs a second stack (probably for keeping track
> of mutex, i don't know...). DJGPP has no sigstack or sigaltstack.
> 
> Is this something doable, or should I just stop now and not waste my time.

It's doable, but requires changes to the library.  If you are
interested in working on this, please write to
djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com.

TIA