Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 19:46:02 -0500
Message-Id: <200212230046.gBN0k2t00596@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <au572d$qav$1@newsread1.arcor-online.net> (invalid@dd.com)
Subject: Re: pdcurses
References: <au4pqv$4gm$1 AT newsread1 DOT arcor-online DOT net> <200212221851 DOT gBMIpFx30413 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <au572d$qav$1 AT newsread1 DOT arcor-online DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> So it seems that this problem was ignored last time.
> Should it be ignored again?

It would be acceptable to be no worse than last time.  It would be
better, of course, to be better than last time.