From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject: Re: inline assembly syntax for accessing variables ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <atses9$d2v$1 AT news DOT online DOT de> <attfnk$u3j$1 AT news DOT online DOT de> <atukmf$ngm$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <au052c$bti$1 AT news DOT online DOT de> <au05c6$c1k$1 AT news DOT online DOT de>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.8 (sun4u))
Message-ID: <1040549627.443329@queeg.ludd.luth.se>
Cache-Post-Path: queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT brother DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date: 22 Dec 2002 09:33:47 GMT
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Host: queeg.ludd.luth.se
X-Trace: 1040549627 news.luth.se 59764 130.240.16.109
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Lars O. Hansen <lars DOT o DOT hansen AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
: but why are the executables so large then?

: Tasm produces exes around 500 byte from that asm code.

: gcc 50,000 byte !

Read the FAQ.


Right,

						MartinS