Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:44:58 -0400 Message-Id: <200210111744.g9BHiwm06086@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20021011173855.5277.qmail@web40103.mail.yahoo.com> (message from yossi khalon on Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: CYGWIN and DJGPP References: <20021011173855 DOT 5277 DOT qmail AT web40103 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > CYGWIN by far better then DGJPP !! Unless you're running MS-DOS, OS/2, Freedos, dosemu under linux, or an embedded board. Or if you want to redistribute your application without cygwin1.dll and/or the need to set up a mount table. Both djgpp and cygwin have their places, neither is "better" than the other when you consider all the ways they get used.