From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject: Re: turbo c++ vs djgpp
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <54527c66 DOT 0207290812 DOT 11eba9ab AT posting DOT google DOT com>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.5_BETA (alpha))
Message-ID: <1027977284.571150@queeg.ludd.luth.se>
Cache-Post-Path: queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date: 29 Jul 2002 21:14:44 GMT
Lines: 27
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jul 2002 21:14:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: queeg.ludd.luth.se
X-Trace: 1027977284 news.luth.se 442 130.240.16.109
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

pandu <p_riantono AT hotmail DOT com> wrote:
: I found some problems in using functions/methods of iostream.h and
: fstream.h .
: I have written a program in Turbo C++, and when it was compiled (by
: DJGPP) , there were some error massages that concerned stream (like
: cout, cin, fout,fin, etc).
: Would you tell me how to solve these problems ? 

How could we? You don't show us the error messages!

But if it's gpp 3.<something> you're using, then your C++ probably
isn't current standard C++.

: If we operate a big multidimensional array, is it necessary to use a
: pointer and memory allocation (malloc or calloc) ?

On the stack, yes. The stack is limited. Global ones, no.

: Are there any other ' differences' between Turbo C++ and DJGPP ? 

Well, with DJGPP you have the source and very much more up-to-date
C++.


Right,

						MartinS