From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Recursions and Static declarations....?Is this wrong... Date: 19 Jul 2002 10:48:00 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <5a91d0ef DOT 0207181004 DOT 49e67056 AT posting DOT google DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1027075680 29111 137.226.32.75 (19 Jul 2002 10:48:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jul 2002 10:48:00 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In comp.os.msdos.djgpp kers AT hplb DOT hpl DOT hp DOT com wrote: > In article , > Hans-Bernhard Broeker writes: >> >> No, you can't. At least not sensibly, in the way you did it. You >> shouldn't be recursing for this, in the first place, nor should you >> ever use static variables to keep state across a recursion call. > Not even for such things as recording recursion depth for prettyprinting? Not in a useful way, if the static is local to the recursive function. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.