From: Martin Str|mberg Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP packages of GNU units 1.80 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <200207131100 DOT g6DB0t409242 AT delorie DOT com> <1026566850 DOT 605764 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3d302dbb$0$23718$9b622d9e AT news DOT freenet DOT de> <3d306f07 DOT 2039231600 AT news DOT cis DOT dfn DOT de> User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.5_BETA (alpha)) User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.5_BETA (alpha)) Message-ID: <1026621947.420523@queeg.ludd.luth.se> Cache-Post-Path: queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) Date: 14 Jul 2002 04:45:47 GMT Lines: 53 NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jul 2002 04:45:47 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: queeg.ludd.luth.se X-Trace: 1026621947 news.luth.se 466 130.240.16.109 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Dan Luecking wrote: : On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:42:58 +0200, "deckerben" : wrote: :> :>"Martin Str|mberg" wrote in message :>news:1026566850 DOT 605764 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se... :>> Richard Dawe wrote: :> :>> y = 9/5*x + 32 (or some variation thereof) surely looks extremely :>> linear to me. :> :>Could it be that the term 'nonlinear' is being loosely applied here to :>conversions requiring monomial/polynomial funcions as opposed to a simple :>ratio of conversion? : *Informally*, the function 1.8*x + 32 can be called linear because : its graph is a line. *Technically*, it is an _affine_ function. : Linear functions satisfy f(a*u + b*v) = a*f(u) + b*f(v). Affine : functions are linear functions composed with a shift. A linear : function might represent conversion of temperature differences, : while an affine function would represent conversion of absolute : temperatures. You are completely right. 1. Lienar functionns do (mathematically) obsevere that property. (Deep digging in high school (or college, I'm unsure which level would be equvialent) defininitions affirms this), 2, I surely wouldn't want the matematically definition of linear functions be diluted. 3. Nevertheless y(x)=a*x+b _is_ a linear function, isn't it. 3a. Yes. We seem to have a confusion of terms. y is an affinite function., not a linear one. !Panic! 3b. No. y(x)=a*(x)+b is a linear function, but only to the mathematically unexperinced. y(x)=a*x is a linear function, while y(x)=a*x+b isn't as long as b!=0. Further mystery (to 3a): Why are y(x)=a*x+b, b=!0, even though of as linear funtions? They are a straight line, which sort of supports the idea of a linear function. Right, MartinS