From: clc5q AT cobra DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU (Clark L. Coleman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DOS Protected Mode Services under Windows XP
Date: 23 Jun 2002 19:27:52 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <af57fo$444$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020623082714 DOT 7660H-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cobra.cs.virginia.edu
X-Trace: murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU 1024860472 4228 128.143.137.16 (23 Jun 2002 19:27:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT virginia DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Jun 2002 19:27:52 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020623082714 DOT 7660H-100000 AT is>,
Eli Zaretskii  <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>On 22 Jun 2002 clc5q AT cobra DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU wrote:
>
>> I just figured out the rather simple problem: After installing the XP
>> fixed binary for gcc 2.95.3, I forgot to redo the stubedit for cc1.exe
>> in order to increase the stack space so it could handle such a large
>> compilation.
>
>To what value did you need to increase the max stack space?

Using stubedit on cc1.exe, I increased the maximum stack to 0x800000,
which is much larger than the default. Most users would have no need
of this, but I have some machine-generated source code as input that
is quite unusual.

Clark Coleman