X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Message-ID: <3CAA110E.DC266018@notifier-is.net> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 15:14:06 -0500 From: david lindauer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.arch.embedded,alt.comp.hardware,comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Windows XP gotchas References: <3C751F4C DOT 7E49D909 AT cisco DOT com> <3C9A8EBC DOT 60E87448 AT d2dc DOT net> <2002Mar26 DOT 110424 AT a0 DOT complang DOT tuwien DOT ac DOT at> <772053ad DOT 0203260814 DOT 23655ecb AT posting DOT google DOT com> <3CA24C17 DOT 8B2B0F16 AT hda DOT hydro DOT com> <3CA2E3A7 DOT D9B183F0 AT yahoo DOT com> <3ca32621 DOT 107462236 AT news DOT tiscali DOT nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: netco.ded.iglou.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: netco.ded.iglou.com X-Trace: news.iglou.com 1017777972 netco.ded.iglou.com (2 Apr 2002 15:06:12 -0500) Lines: 40 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.255.235.109 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Richard Bos wrote: > jcmorris AT mitre DOT org (Joe Morris) wrote: > > > If anyone wants to see the license text, it can be found in the file > > d:\I386\EULA.TXT on the XP disk: it's the last sentence in the first > > bullet item under the heading "GRANT OF LICENSE": > > > > Except as otherwise permitted by the > > NetMeeting, Remote Assistance, and Remote Desktop > > features described below, you may not use the Product > > to permit any Device to use, access, display or run other > > executable software residing on the Workstation Computer, > > nor may you permit any Device to use, access, display, > > or run the Product or Product's user interface, unless > > the Device has a separate license for the Product. > > Bah. This means, if you interpret it anally enough[1], that you cannot > use XP on a network at all. After all, if someone opens a file on your > network, this means that part of the disk control software on your > computer must be executed, at his command. > > You know, I keep hoping someone finally uses M$'s blunders to convince > the public that M$ OSes are not suitable for commercial use, but the > public probably isn't that bright. Pity. > > Richard > > [1] And for anal, you just cannot beat M$'s law creeps. I interpreted the 'use and access' thing so literally that you can't even network it, even through a serial port to a remote device, because you would have to run some sort of executable on XP which while you've written it, still resides there. Hope I'm wrong and that wasn't their intention... David