X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:36:28 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Mark Stolz <mstolz AT esmertec DOT com>
Message-Id: <7704-Fri01Feb2002143627+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3C5A7C29.E36B9BDA@esmertec.com> (message from Mark Stolz on Fri,
	01 Feb 2002 12:29:45 +0100)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Update of DJGPP port of GCC-3.0.3
References: <3C5A8D00 DOT 11190 DOT 967BC4 AT localhost> <3C5A7C29 DOT E36B9BDA AT esmertec DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:29:45 +0100
> From: Mark Stolz <mstolz AT esmertec DOT com>
> 
> Agreed. The GCJ docs discuss porting the thread layer, the file handling
> layer, and the signal handling layer. Of these, I think that threading and
> signal support would be the most challenging since DOS doesn't provide support
> for either (there might also be some DPMI issues, too).

DJGPP does support signals.  Do we really need them supported by DOS?