X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: "Jeroen Vandezande" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: C or C++? Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 01:31:28 +0100 Organization: [ posted via Easynet Belgium ] Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 212-100-181-30.adsl.easynet.be X-Trace: rivage.news.be.easynet.net 1011918688 31900 212.100.181.30 (25 Jan 2002 00:31:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT easynet DOT be NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jan 2002 00:31:28 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Thanks!, The TP programs contain no OO, but I am reading a few book about learning OO and, while looking at my old TP code I found that I could brake up the program in some nice classes, so maybe I will go for C++. "Hans-Bernhard Broeker" wrote in message news:a2m9ok$bvp$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE... > Jeroen Vandezande wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am learning C and will soon convert at my work my old Turbo Pascal > > Progs to C/C++ but what should I use C or C++? > > I'd make that decision on a per-program basis. If the Pascal program > is in traditional Turbo Pascal (version 5.0 or below, IIRC), it will > have no OO in it. In that case, C is the better choice because it > more closely reflects the type of programming language TurboPascal > was, back then. It's also a smaller language, so it should be easier > to learn. > > If, OTOH, your program was made with later version of Turbo Pascal, it > may already be using Objects (certainly will if you were using the > Turbo Vision user interface library). In that case, you'll be a lot > better off translating it into C++. > > > > -- > Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) > Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.