X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:54:48 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Raf256 <raf256 AT go2 DOT pl>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Allegro, djgpp 3.02
In-Reply-To: <Xns916B7E3E3E702rfdfciasdsdj412tr@213.180.128.20>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011202145332.9372C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On 2 Dec 2001, Raf256 wrote:

> 3. imho djgpp 3.02 build+complie time is much (50%) longer then 2.95, is 
> this true ?

Compiling C programs or C++ programs?

If you are talking about C programs, I see something like 30% slow-down 
in compilation speed.  I don't know about C++, but it won't surprise me 
if it were much slower, since it now supports a much larger language than 
before.