Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:43:03 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <1438-Tue27Nov2001224303+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3C03C095.AEBDC2EC@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Tue, 27
	Nov 2001 17:32:04 GMT)
Subject: Re: uclock() and struct rusage
References: <3C03503F DOT E9AE61D3 AT bigfoot DOT com> <3C03C095 DOT AEBDC2EC AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:32:04 GMT
> 
> *** Posted and mailed ***

It would be nice if you omitted the humongous quote...

> I expect this is not even portable under W98.  I hope to try it
> later using the identical compiler, etc., but running on this '486
> system.  I expect it will crash with an 'illegal instruction'
> failing.

What possible cause(s) do you see for the illegal instruction
failure?