Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 10:34:04 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mr. Veli Suorsa" <veli DOT suorsa AT surfeu DOT fi>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: gcc-3.0.2 for DJGPP updated
In-Reply-To: <3C003DB7.35303F86@surfeu.fi>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011125103341.3587C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Mr. Veli Suorsa wrote:

> > >>        http://www.simtel.net/pub/djgpp/v2gnu/
> > >
> > >Why would this not be put in a new V3 directory?
> > Just the other week it was all explained here
> 
> I was wondering that same, too. Why not use V3 sub-directory! It
> should be better way to separate all earlier libs.

The earlier libraries are all perfectly usable with GCC 3.x.  SO
there's no need to separate anything.

> Can you explain again that other week explanation?

The "v2" part in "v2gnu" comes from the DJGPP version, not from GCC
version.  DJGPP is still in version 2.03, and will remain in the v2.x
land for the observable future.