Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Optimized binary crashes
From: Sami <no AT spam DOT com>
References: <Xns9129BB766E146gd678bcz5bAA AT 192 DOT 89 DOT 123 DOT 233> <3BB3640E DOT 8B31A32E AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <Xns9129DE8CCA845gd678bcz5bAA@192.89.123.233>
User-Agent: Xnews/4.06.22
Lines: 11
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:51:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.251.251.83
X-Trace: read2.inet.fi 1001616672 194.251.251.83 (Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:51:12 EET DST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:51:12 EET DST
Organization: Sonera corp Internet services
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> wrote in
news:3BB3640E DOT 8B31A32E AT yahoo DOT com: 
>> When using (gcc version 2.95.3) "-fomit-frame-pointer" with
>> optimizations (-Ox) "throw" always crashes (for example when
>> allocating memory). Have I misconfigured or misunderstood something or
>> why is this happening? 
> I am not surprised.  How is the run-time supposed to untangle the
> calls without frame pointers?

Do you have any tips this issue? I use the 'throw' only in constructors
and I have to use -fomit-frame-pointer for the speed.