From: "Graham Warren" <Moosehead AT tesco DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Possible bug
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:17:55 +0100
Organization: Tesco ISP
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <9oi2nc$1jc$1@barcode.tesco.net>
References: <004601c142e7$6f0a2920$323647a1 AT robert> <1pkoqt4ocnvr400nklea28vr51no8tkbsh AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup.62-172-22-24.tesco.net
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


Radical NetSurfer wrote in message
<1pkoqt4ocnvr400nklea28vr51no8tkbsh AT 4ax DOT com>...
>221T (decimal) = $DD = 335O (octal) produces for me in windows
>a  pipe-like character that has a tiny break in it,
>
>while the usual pipe char, 124T ($7C = 174O) in windows, appears as a
>solid pipe character.
>
> Now..
>In pure MSDOS terms (running an msdos editor in this case),
>I get just the opposite appearence from these two values!
>
>where, indeed, ALT0221 does produce a "fat-pipe"
>
>go figure!
>
>now if only the bugs in the GCC library relating to
>strupr, strlwr, and toupper, tolower were only fixed.
>

What are the bugs relating to strupr, strlwr and toupper and tolower ?