Message-ID: <3BAB5807.A48DAFAF@yahoo.com.NOSPAM>
From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com DOT NOSPAM>
Organization: Ched Research
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Testing GPC under DJGPP
References: <3BAA1F02 DOT 7AB1E05D AT yahoo DOT com DOT NOSPAM> <3BAB1CBA DOT A6261715 AT falconsoft DOT be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:18:33 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.90.176.19
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1001085513 12.90.176.19 (Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:18:33 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:18:33 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Tim Van Holder wrote:
> 
> CBFalconer wrote:
> >
> > I saw some things in the GPC docs about not overlaying memory
> > areas in variant records, which worried me inasmuch as many
> > programs depend on this for interfacing.
> 
> This is really a GPC issue, not a DJGPP issue.
> I suggest you take a look at
>   http://agnes.dida.physik.uni-essen.de/~gnu-pascal/
> and possibly file a bug report.

I put it here because it was running under DJGPP, which could make
a difference.  It went on pascal.misc because that is where the
FAQ says to put it, and on pascal.iso-ansi because it is about
standards compliance.
-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT XXXXworldnet DOT att DOT net)
   (Remove "XXXX" from reply address. yahoo works unmodified)
   mailto:uce AT ftc DOT gov  (for spambots to harvest)