X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:41:56 -0500 From: JT Williams To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: memory under DOS Message-ID: <20010720094156.A18035@kendall.sfbr.org> Mail-Followup-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com References: <20010717160543 DOT 05952 DOT 00000668 AT ng-ba1 DOT aol DOT com> <200107172028 DOT QAA32600 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200107172028.QAA32600@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 04:28:10PM -0400 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk -: Try taking himem.sys out completely and see if cwsdpmi does the right -: thing. Or, you may have to load some alternate xms driver, like qemm -: or 386max. Are there *any* advantages to loading HIMEM.SYS in protected mode? Loading DOS `high' or `low' may be irrelevant in PM, but what about shadow RAM, EMB handles, or a20 control?