From: invalid AT erehwon DOT invalid (Graaagh the Mighty)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: DJGPP reserves wrong int size
Organization: Low Charisma Anonymous
Message-ID: <3b3d923f.361916829@news.primus.ca>
References: <9dde68b7 DOT 0106241053 DOT 2a385311 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <slrn9jcd8c DOT kb DOT kaz AT cafe DOT net> <3b37e7cc DOT 288391695 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> <eg1ijtcvubi4utrqpk860oum1k58metab8 AT 4ax DOT com> <3b3b4b39 DOT 212640295 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> <3b3c566c DOT 254186254 AT news DOT worldonline DOT nl>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
Lines: 37
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:51:17 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.176.153.6
X-Complaints-To: news AT primus DOT ca
X-Trace: news1.tor.primus.ca 993891354 207.176.153.6 (Sat, 30 Jun 2001 04:55:54 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 04:55:54 EDT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:46:47 GMT, info AT hoekstra-uitgeverij DOT nl (Richard
Bos) sat on a tribble, which squeaked:

>So learn to read headers.

I do know how to read them, thank you very much.

>I know; I'm using it. And guess what? Right now, I've got a line on my
>screen telling me where this message is going.

Same here. Seems to be comd, clc, clc++. But previously, when I was
reading, it only listed comd?

>The result of running a C implementation on a C program
>must result in the semantics the Standard demands of these
>implementations and programs. _However_, these are not required to be
>object modules. They may well be direct executables. Or, for example,
>the implementation may be an interpreter, and the only output you get is
>the output from the program, without any intermediate module or
>executable at all.

Hmm. Okay, so I can have my "compiler" invoke GCC, link and run the
result, delete the binary, and reboot the computer, and *then* it's
legit. :-)

>However, such matters are entirely implementation-dependent, and
>therefore off-topic for comp.lang.c. Had the original message been
>posted only to c.o.m.d., you might have had a point here, but on c.l.c,
>you don't.

Or rather, I have a third of a point? 1/3 on comd, 0 on clc, 0 on
clc++?
-- 
Bill Gates: "No computer will ever need more than 640K of RAM." -- 1980
"There's nobody getting rich writing software that I know of." -- 1980
"This antitrust thing will blow over." -- 1998
Combine neo, an underscore, and one thousand sixty-one to make my hotmail addy.