Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:02:52 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org Message-Id: <3596-Fri29Jun2001190251+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20010629100538.A9023@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT Williams on Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:05:38 -0500) Subject: Re: Man-pages in DJGPP packages References: <7534 DOT 993633786 AT www35 DOT gmx DOT net> <7156 DOT 993649601 AT www35 DOT gmx DOT net> <20010629064701 DOT A8928 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3942-Fri29Jun2001173939+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010629100538 DOT A9023 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:05:38 -0500 > From: JT Williams > > (1) the extension: `.1l' (as given in the manpage itself) or `.1' > (2) the location: `man/cat1l/*.1l' or `man/cat1/*.1l' > > I agree that (2) is not so important---it is variable from system > to system---but (1) is something that might reasonably be fixed. I agree that we generally should follow what "make install" does in the original distribution (except that it installs in man* instead of cat*).