From: invalid AT erehwon DOT invalid (Graaagh the Mighty) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Strange behavior of compiler. Organization: Low Charisma Anonymous Message-ID: <3b3b4af5.212572777@news.primus.ca> References: X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 Lines: 25 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:20:05 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.176.153.4 X-Complaints-To: news AT primus DOT ca X-Trace: news1.tor.primus.ca 993741668 207.176.153.4 (Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:21:08 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:21:08 EDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:19:06 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii sat on a tribble, which squeaked: > >On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Graaagh the Mighty wrote: > >> >stabs debugging is better because the compiler generates much more >> >detailed info, including more detailed line number information and other >> >important data. >> >> And the not available/broken bit? > >It's not broken more than it is on Unix. There are known limitations >with stabs, but they are inherent to its design, not specific to DJGPP. >And the COFF debug limitations are much more grave. Yeah, that was it, there was some reason this wouldn't work right until you switched to the elf format, which you hadn't yet. And presumably still haven't, since it was so desirable it'd be headline news if you had. -- Bill Gates: "No computer will ever need more than 640K of RAM." -- 1980 "There's nobody getting rich writing software that I know of." -- 1980 "This antitrust thing will blow over." -- 1998 Combine neo, an underscore, and one thousand sixty-one to make my hotmail addy.