Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:16:40 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: "Lionel Brits" Message-Id: <8011-Sat23Jun2001111639+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <9gvthl$45k$1@news3.cadvision.com> (britsc@cadvision.com) Subject: Re: DJGPP under Windows 2000 References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 20010621192012 DOT 00988100 AT ds DOT unifi DOT it> <8011-Thu21Jun2001213916+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <9gvthl$45k$1 AT news3 DOT cadvision DOT com> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "Lionel Brits" > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:58:38 -0600 > > Where does that leave DJGPP and Windows XP? Who knows? They could fix some W2K bugs which are causing the problems, or they could leave them unfixed and add some more, as happened with the transition from NT4 to W2K. Without trying, there's no way to tell, because Microsoft doesn't tell us what changes were done and what bugs were fixed in enough detail to figure that out.