From: "Wojciech Galazka" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Update of DJGPP port of GNU gdbm 1.8.0 uploaded Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 16:38:16 +0200 Organization: NASK - www.nask.pl Lines: 7 Message-ID: <9fdhul$g7$1@pippin.nask.waw.pl> References: <200105281949 DOT PAA05894 AT delorie DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: wawhsa-240.dial.plusgsm.pl X-Trace: pippin.nask.waw.pl 991578904 519 212.2.98.240 (3 Jun 2001 14:35:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet AT nask DOT pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 14:35:04 +0000 (UTC) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > This update accounts for the fact that DJGPP's implementation > of fcntl() does not support F_GETLK, F_SETLK nor F_SETLKW. Just curious, why doesn't fcntl () support these flags ?