Message-ID: <3B120E39.318EB27F@bellatlantic.net> From: EZoto X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.mail-news,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.msdos.pcgeos Subject: Re: Spambot Fodder : Dont bother to read, just spamming a spammer References: <9epgi4$h5b$857 AT uranium DOT btinternet DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 35 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 05:33:56 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.150.102.29 X-Complaints-To: business-support AT verizon DOT com X-Trace: typhoon2.ba-dsg.net 991028036 141.150.102.29 (Mon, 28 May 2001 01:33:56 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 01:33:56 EDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com I find that the best way to get back at a spammer is too simply tell him his spamming doesn't work. I get spammed all the time and not one has affected me or hurt my computer. That goes for viruses as well. These losers use their skills to annoy, offend or ever hurt peoples computers with spam or viruses. I use my skills to ignore them because they don't affect my machine. Spam or viruses. EZoto Samuel W. Heywood wrote: > On 27 May 2001 mailto wrote: > > > > In "spamming the spammer" you have produced collateral damage in spamming > us too. > > It is absolurely pointless to spam a spammer because in doing so the only > thing you will accomplish is to confirm for him that your email address is > indeed valid and that he was successful in targeting the address that > he had collected. > > You should never inform your enemies of their successes in attacking you. > They will continue their exploits against your known weaknesses. > > I can understand your frustration and your desire to get even with a > spammer. You should devise some other means of counterattack. Good > luck. > > All the best, > > Sam Heywood > -- Message sent by PC-Pine, v.3.96 for DOS, http://www.washington.edu/pine