X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 10:25:25 -0500
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: __DJGPP__ and MSDOS
Message-ID: <20010505102525.A20373@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010430093758 DOT A5379 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010430192119 DOT 19343D-100000 AT is> <20010504160823 DOT A19921 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <1438-Sat05May2001094057+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <1438-Sat05May2001094057+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Sat, May 05, 2001 at 09:40:58AM +0300
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: > So, depending on header #include order, __DJGPP__ may not be defined
-: > and available for #ifdef testing inside `hello.h'.
-: 
-: I suspect that you don't have a specs file, or use specs from a later
-: GCC distribution.  GCC 2.7.x needs lib/specs to define the symbol
-: __DJGPP__ (and also __DJGPP_MINOR__) to the right values.

There is no specs file on my stock djgpp system, and this is because the
gcc2721b.zip archive does *not* contain a specs file---the only files in
that archive (sans info and manifest files) are these:

  1065472  10-19-96 10:32   bin/cc1.exe
   119808  10-19-96 10:28   bin/cpp.exe
   106496  10-19-96 10:28   bin/gcc.exe
    59904  10-19-96 10:26   bin/gxx.exe
    46778  09-02-96 14:48   lib/libgcc.a

All post-2.7.2.1 gcc binary distros appear to contain a specs file (and
have a completely reorganized directory structure too), so was the djgpp
gcc2.7.2.1 binary distro then `broken'?  Or is this old gcc incompatible
with djgpp 2.03?

I'm perfectly willing to upgrade my gcc, but I want to understand this
matter, too.

TIA/jtw