From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Binutils 2.11 released
Date: 2 May 2001 09:19:30 GMT
Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <9cojf2$jt6$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References: <200104261711 DOT NAA00607 AT delorie DOT com> <9cdcdp$uqp$1 AT slb1 DOT atl DOT mindspring DOT net> <3AEF39B6 DOT 3080305 AT operamail DOT com> <9cnh6q$olf$1 AT slb3 DOT atl DOT mindspring DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 988795170 20390 137.226.32.75 (2 May 2001 09:19:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 May 2001 09:19:30 GMT
Originator: broeker@
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Marp <marp AT 0 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 0> wrote:

> No, the files on simtel clearly show older binutils with higher version
> numbers than the newer ones judging by the dates of the files. We went from
> a higher version number to a lower one when 2.10 was released, and it seems
> to make no sense.

You're obviously interpreting version numbers as if they were floating
point numbers --- but they aren't. 2.10 is to be read as "two dot
ten", not "two dot one zero". In particular, it definitely does not
mean 2 + 10/100.

The only actual problem in this area is the 8+3 filename limitation
imposed on the distribution zip file names. There, 2.10 becomes 210,
which may indeed look as if it's smaller than 2951, which originally
meant 2.9.5.1.



-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.