From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: gcc for djgpp vs borland c compiler
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 00:31:23 -0400
Organization: Global Crossing Telecommunications
Lines: 26
Sender: UNKNOWN AT 209-130-220-133 DOT nas1 DOT roc DOT gblx DOT net
Message-ID: <9cg5c3$12u0$1@node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net>
References: <9cg46n$kk5$1 AT sunlight DOT pku DOT edu DOT cn>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209-130-220-133.nas1.roc.gblx.net
X-Trace: node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net 988518595 35776 209.130.220.133 (29 Apr 2001 04:29:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT frontiernet DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Apr 2001 04:29:55 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Danny" <dguo AT 263 DOT net> wrote in message
news:9cg46n$kk5$1 AT sunlight DOT pku DOT edu DOT cn...
> Hi, THere.
>
> I have got both gcc for djgpp and borland C compiler (bcc32). I compared
> them on a simple 'hello world' C code. I found gcc made a EXE with size of
> 107,516bytes, while bcc32 generated a EXE with size of 52,736bytes.
>
> How come they are so different?

1. turn on optimization
2. get a rid of debug info

but better:
0. go read DJGPP FAQ

Good Luck
--
Alexei A. Frounze
alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru
http://alexfru.chat.ru
http://members.xoom.com/alexfru/
http://welcome.to/pmode/