From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:30:48 +0200
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: AMD-K7 speed optimization
Message-ID: <20010419183048.A747@lauras.lt>
References: <20010418221200 DOT A976 AT lauras DOT lt> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010419110412 DOT 9514K-100000 AT is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010419110412.9514K-100000@is>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:05:39AM +0300
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> > See www.athlonlinux.org for advices. They have recipes for best options
> > with GCC 2.95 series, also they have a version of GCC with Athlon's
> > optimizations - AthlonGCC.
> 
> Are the GCC options suggested there different in any way from what is 
> best for Pentium II or Pentium III?  

I don't know. They look this way, but alignment rules may differ or 
something. Those options really are not athlon specific (in upstream GCC
athlon support will be starting from 3.0). The most helpful option
would be -mathlon or -march=athlon. Scheduling matters.

Laurynas