Message-ID: <3ADD7C03.ACF8938C@ma.tum.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:35:31 +0200
From: Waldemar Schultz <schultzma AT mathematik DOT tu-muenchen DOT de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: de,en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: MINGW vs DJGPP
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010418141437 DOT 27491B-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by sunrbg2.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de id NAA10285
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id HAA10142
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii schrieb:
> 
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Waldemar Schultz wrote:
> 
> > BTW I couldn't resist to try the `-fpack-struct' switch Eli mentioned:
> > now MINGW reports the size of the struct being _97_ vs _88_ without the
> > switch.
> 
> That sounds like a bug in MinGW.  What version of GCC is that?  Is the
> version of GCC you use for DJGPP compilation different?

MINGW>gcc -v
Reading specs from
E:\MINGW\BIN\..\lib\gcc-lib\i386-mingw32msvc\2.95.2\specs
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)

DJGPP>gcc -v
Reading specs from e:/djgpp/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.952/specs
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)

-- 
 Gruss Waldemar Schultz.
 Technische Universität München, Zentrum Mathematik M1, D 80290 München
 Tel: +49 (0)89 2892 8226        FAX: +49 (0)89 2892 8228