Message-ID: <3AA2763B.96DA12BF@home.com>
From: Paul Michailidis <paulm14 AT home DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Advantages/Disadvantages of RHIDE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 12
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:07:29 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.112.60.10
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT home DOT net
X-Trace: news4.rdc1.on.home.com 983725649 24.112.60.10 (Sun, 04 Mar 2001 09:07:29 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 09:07:29 PST
Organization: Excite AT Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Just as the subject states? Is there any downfalls to rhide? I
personally like the gui cause it resembles the borland compiler gui I
used to work with. I actually have the same problem as "xavier", it says
"allegro.h": no such file or directory and i included "alleg" in the
check box as well. Apparantly I now have to create some batch files
before running rhide to ensure rhide works correctly. If I didn't use
rhide and used command line compilation instead,would I need to do all
that extra stuff?

Thanks,
Paul M.