Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 17:26:39 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: rpolzer AT web DOT de (Rudolf Polzer)
Message-Id: <2110-Sun18Feb2001172639+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <slrn98vavt.rr.rpolzer@rebounce.rpolzer-lx>
Subject: Re: Newbie with invalid argument
References: <20010217111622 DOT 24753 DOT 00001357 AT ng-fl1 DOT aol DOT com> <slrn98ti7t DOT h8q DOT rpolzer AT rebounce DOT rpolzer-lx> <3099-Sat17Feb2001215021+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <slrn98vavt DOT rr DOT rpolzer AT rebounce DOT rpolzer-lx>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: rpolzer AT web DOT de (Rudolf Polzer)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:03:25 +0100
> 
> I answered this because I was wondering why gxx wanted to _rename_ an .o
> file to an .exe file.

I'm guessing that the message was cited inaccurately.  The message was
probably coming from stubufy, which is indeed renaming the stubbed
COFF image it creates to foo.exe as the final stage.

That's why I asked for the exact text of the message.