Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:31:04 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz AT is To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [malfer AT teleline DOT es: Announce GRX 2.3.4] In-Reply-To: <3A8BE70F.10008.8D694A@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote: > > IMHO, the only file that might be a good idea to have in DOS CRLF > > format is the DJGPP-specific README. It is the only file that a naive > > user should be able to read with the most basic (read: stock DOS) > > tools, such as the TYPE command. > > In all latest archives of DJGPP port of gcc-2.95.X I only .BAT files > (there is only one in gcc295Xs.zip) were in CR LF format. > All other files (including DJGPP related readme files) were in Unix text > format. I didn't saw any objections about this. There are not so much > programs which are not able to display such files (like Notapad.exe) That's why I said ``might be a good idea'' above. > PS. Perhaps I should have changed this if somebody objected ... If we could be sure people actually read those README files, we all would have been happier people ;-)