Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:15:43 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2593-Mon12Feb2001211543+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
In-reply-to: <968vhj$55q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (gbcshady@my-deja.com)
Subject: Re: objcopy problems.
References: <966tp1$i25$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <968k55$plu$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <968vhj$55q$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: gbcshady AT my-deja DOT com
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:30:08 GMT
> 
> $ objcopy -v -I binary -O coff-go32 input.bin output.o
> > copy from input.bin(binary) to output.o(coff-go32)
> > Warning: Output file cannot represent architecture UNKNOWN!
> $ nm output.o
> > c:/djgpp/bin/nm.exe: output.o: File format not recognized
> 
> So I maintain that there is something broken within objcopy.

And I maintain that you could be better off if you tell how did you
produce that binary file, and what kind of code went into it.  It
might turn out that this is indeed immaterial, but then again, it
might not.  What do you have to lose?