From: "Tanes Sriviroolchai" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <200102062049 DOT PAA16815 AT delorie DOT com> <95u99e$13m9$1 AT news DOT itfs DOT nsk DOT su> <3a8362f1 AT rpc1284 DOT daytonoh DOT ncr DOT com> <9610ci$2kd8$1 AT news DOT itfs DOT nsk DOT su> Subject: Re: REANNOUCE: DJGPP port of STLport 4.0 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:20:20 +0700 Lines: 26 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.127.136.173 Message-ID: <3a875690@rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com> X-Original-Trace: 11 Feb 2001 22:20:48 -0500, 192.127.136.173 NNTP-Posting-Host: ncrnews.daytonoh.ncr.com X-Trace: 12 Feb 2001 10:29:30 -0500, ncrnews.daytonoh.ncr.com To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Michael N. Filippov" wrote in message news:9610ci$2kd8$1 AT news DOT itfs DOT nsk DOT su... > Tanes Sriviroolchai wrote: > > Michael, > > The current libstdc++ distributed with gcc 2.95.2 is not ISO C++ > > Standard compliant according to gcc homepage > > Anyway, lets estimate: if compile empty int main(void) { return 0; } > starting size (stub) if about 50 Kb. It means for 150 Kb and 750 Kb > files that one library it 7 (!!!) time bigger. The difference in the > funcuonality is negligible (comparing to basic_string, vector, set etc - I think there are a lot of reports of using libstdc++-v3 and the size is far bigger than the old libstdc++. I don't know what happen inside when the standard ISO C++ library is implemented. Anyway, it is your choice to use. This port might be useless at all for you but it may be useful to someone, I guess. Or you may help by do something reduce its size. ;) Regards, Tanes Sriviroolchai