Message-ID: <000e01c09133$f120eb80$0e8624d5@zephyr>
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou AT libertysurf DOT fr>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: "Djgpp newsgroup" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010207153830 DOT 4599Y-100000 AT is> <001501c09115$4dfc6060$fe8524d5 AT zephyr> <8011-Wed07Feb2001192000+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: Re: Win2k vs Win NT4
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:29:42 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> One is that programs nested more than 2 levels cause NTVDM to crash on
> W2K, but not on NT.  The other is that the LFN function that renames a
> file fails on W2K with a weird error code if the target file already
> exists (this is known to cause linking to fail when GCC runs stubify).

I was aware of the former problem, but not of the latter.

> There might be other differences, I don't remember.  You might
> consider looking in the mail archives, there were quite a few reports
> about W2K woes.

I'll do. Thanks for these detailed informations.

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou AT multimania DOT com