Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:39:25 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou AT libertysurf DOT fr>
cc: Djgpp newsgroup <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Win2k vs Win NT4
In-Reply-To: <009d01c09105$a9afab20$078124d5@zephyr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010207153830.4599Y-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Eric Botcazou wrote:

> > IMHO, it hardly makes sense to use Int 33h calls to distinguish between
> > two version of the OS.  It's certainly wrong for a library to do that;
> > perhaps on the application level it is justified.
> 
> The mouse driver is primarily affected, so using Int 33h seems to be
> regular.

Not at all.  There are additional aspects of NT vs W2K differences which 
other library functions would want to know about.