From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Function and File ordering and speed optimization
Date: 6 Feb 2001 20:54:43 GMT
Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <95poaj$jc2$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References: <3A8049B6 DOT 7C7B7BB1 AT msu DOT edu> <3a806223 DOT 36016915 AT news DOT freeserve DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 981492883 19842 137.226.32.75 (6 Feb 2001 20:54:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Feb 2001 20:54:43 GMT
Originator: broeker@
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Steamer <dontmailme AT iname DOT com> wrote:
> The profiler doesn't tell you how to order the functions.

You haven't seen all of gprof, yet.  It does offer such an ordering, as
one possible alternative output.

gprof is notoriously incompletely documented, which is way I think
many people don't know about all it can do.  The ordering it proposes
is based on the call frequencies, of course, so gprof is the proper
place to implement it.

-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.