Delivered-To: fixup-djgpp AT delorie DOT com@fixme
Message-ID: <000701c08d3d$31dc0c40$fb27e13f@acer>
From: "Donald Stevens" <dstevens6 AT qwest DOT net>
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References: <3A7A936D DOT 26718 DOT 224451 AT localhost>
Subject: Re: Is ATI Rage video board supported?
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:25:50 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

The VESA driver works ok, thanks for the suggestion.
Donald Stevens



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To: Donald Stevens <dstevens6 AT qwest DOT net>; <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: Is ATI Rage video board supported?


> On 1 Feb 2001, at 17:04, Donald Stevens wrote:
> 
> > I have made  libgrx20.a ok using the make files and
> > setting   grx20drv=mach64.   But the modetest
> > program (and my own programs) do not work
> > properly beyond 640x480x256
> > My video board is ATI Rage with mach 64 chip.
> > All works ok in Linux and win98.
> > What reasonably priced video boards will work
> > properly with grx?
> > Donald Stevens      dstevens6 AT qwest DOT net
> > 
> 
> Do You really need to use mach64 driver?
> 
> I used VESA driver for Rage2C based card (ATI 3D CHARGER) and
> it worked OK. VESA driver works for more cards and as result is also 
> more tested.
> 
> Andris
> 
> PS. Of course fixing possible problems with Mach64 driver would be 
> nice ...