From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To: "Donald Stevens" <dstevens6 AT qwest DOT net>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:01:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Is ATI Rage video board supported?
Message-ID: <3A7A936D.26718.224451@localhost>
In-reply-to: <zSme6.2439$vu6.411525@news.uswest.net>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 1 Feb 2001, at 17:04, Donald Stevens wrote:

> I have made  libgrx20.a ok using the make files and
> setting   grx20drv=mach64.   But the modetest
> program (and my own programs) do not work
> properly beyond 640x480x256
> My video board is ATI Rage with mach 64 chip.
> All works ok in Linux and win98.
> What reasonably priced video boards will work
> properly with grx?
> Donald Stevens      dstevens6 AT qwest DOT net
> 

Do You really need to use mach64 driver?

I used VESA driver for Rage2C based card (ATI 3D CHARGER) and
it worked OK. VESA driver works for more cards and as result is also 
more tested.

Andris

PS. Of course fixing possible problems with Mach64 driver would be 
nice ...