From: "Alexei A. Frounze" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: DJGPP timer slowdown Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:31:41 -0500 Lines: 32 Message-ID: <95bodp$g6qhh$1@ID-57378.news.dfncis.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pppa36-resalerochester3-5r7104.dialinx.net (4.4.209.225) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 981034234 17001009 4.4.209.225 (16 [57378]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com OK, this is not a slow-down. That's right. But I've never seen things that guy tell about extended BIOS functions. -- Alexei A. Frounze alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru frounze [AT] ece [DOT] rochester [DOT] edu http://alexfru.chat.ru http://members.xoom.com/alexfru/ http://welcome.to/pmode/ "Eli Zaretskii" wrote in message news:Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010201110914 DOT 13803K-100000 AT is... > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Alexei A. Frounze wrote: > > > Timer itself generates IRQs at a constant rate, right. But the DOS program > > being run under windows (or with presense of such things as SMARTDRV) can > > not have a perfect time measurement and perfect cycle measurement. > > As you can see from the message posted by Damon Casale, I wasn't > talking about the code timing, I was talking about system clock > slow-down apparently caused by a file-compression program. > > > Try to reread my post and see why. > > I think I understood the first time, that's why I wrote what I wrote.