From: Tom St Denis Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: (slightly OT) DJGPP Allegro is faster then MingW32 Allegro? Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:34:57 GMT Organization: Deja.com Lines: 36 Message-ID: <953o1i$k6g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <951vr9$9bf$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.112.8.23 X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 29 12:34:57 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows 98; U) Opera 5.01 [en] X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x71.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 24.112.8.23 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtomstdenis To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article , Damian Yerrick wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:35:53 GMT, Tom St Denis > wrote: > > >When I build tests/test.exe with either I find that hline is faster in DJGPP > >than MingW32 despite my card having "accelerated solid hline functions" (as > >reported by allegro). > > > >I get 850,000 hlines per sec with DJGPP and 400,000 with MingW. > > > >Any clues to why it's slower? > > What did you have running in the background? Windows 9x gives much > more time to DOS tasks than Win32 tasks. Or did you run the DJGPP > version from plain DOS? > > How well optimized is driver support for your card's fill (aka solid > hline) function? > > There's a lot more overhead on some calls under plain old DOS than > there is on WinDOS. > > You might want to take this up with the Allegro mailing list: > http://www.talula.demon.co.uk/allegro/maillist.html > as they likely know much more about Allegro (especially the non-DJGPP > ports) than we do. Well it gets wierder. My 3d library+test runs at the same fps in djgpp as ming. It's only tests/test.exe that differs. Tom Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/