From: Tom St Denis <stdenis AT compmore DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: (slightly OT) DJGPP Allegro is faster then MingW32 Allegro?
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:35:53 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <951vr9$9bf$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.112.8.23
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Jan 28 20:35:53 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows 98; U) Opera 5.01 [en]
X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x64.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 24.112.8.23
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtomstdenis
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

When I build tests/test.exe with either I find that hline is faster in DJGPP
than MingW32 despite my card having "accelerated solid hline functions" (as
reported by allegro).

I get 850,000 hlines per sec with DJGPP and 400,000 with MingW.

Any clues to why it's slower?

Tom


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/