From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Using MASM with DJGPP
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:57:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Lulea, Sweden
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <94ud2h$a2$3@news.luth.se>
References: <Dchc6.1810$Jx5 DOT 65021 AT news2-win DOT server DOT ntlworld DOT com> <5137-Fri26Jan2001195157+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <h9lc6.2458$Jx5 DOT 86397 AT news2-win DOT server DOT ntlworld DOT com>
X-Trace: news.luth.se 980596625 322 130.240.16.18 (27 Jan 2001 11:57:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT luth DOT se
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-981225 ("Volcane") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m))
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Lawrence Rust <lvr AT nosoftspsystemam DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
: What I don' understand is why ld and M$ link disagree on COFF relocations.
: It was originally a unix spec with i386 format being defined by M$.  Oh well
: it just adds to the interest I suppose.

It's the usual behaviour from Microsnoft: they improved the format so
it isn't exactly like the unix spec.


Right,

						MartinS