From: rpolzer AT web DOT de (Rudolf Polzer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Windows ME and DJGPP
References: <20010120205730 DOT 25849 DOT 00000491 AT ng-fd1 DOT aol DOT com> <3a6b7917 DOT 10793503 AT news DOT sci DOT fi> <3A6CB71F DOT 8B4E86C9 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <94k3dc$lf9$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
X-newsgroup: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-realname: Hans-Bernhard Broeker
X-Mailer: GehtDichNenScheissdreckAn 1.0
Message-ID: <slrn96u191.2cl.rpolzer@rebounce.rpolzer-lx>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (Linux)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:38:57 +0100
Lines: 15
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.6.48.91
X-Trace: 980359919 news.freenet.de 13144 213.6.48.91
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT freenet DOT de
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> schrieb folgenden Unsinn:
> Compared to both of these, ME is a pain in the lower back as it comes
> to advanced DJGPP usage. Just as an example, you'll have no way of
> using the full power of the YAMD memory debugger on an ME system
> without applying that highly unofficial patch to re-enable the real
> MS-DOS sleeping inside it.

But that is no argument:
1. if you are still programming in C it's no "advanced DJG_PP_ usage"
2. if you are programming in C++, an overloaded operator new() and
operator delete() will do.

-- 
Nuper erat medicus, nunc est vispillo, Diaulus:
Quod vispillo facit, fecerat et medicus.