Message-ID: <000301c08624$b9418f40$6866fea9@desktop>
From: "Steven C. Hendrickson" <stevenhend01 AT earthlink DOT net>
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References: <01012320174802 DOT 01013 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Subject: Re: DJGPP on win NT
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:13:32 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I was just setting my w98 machine up for djgpp, and looked at the FAQ's at
www.delorie.com because I was having a problem; there was a longish section
on wNT problems, which might help you.

Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "pete" <kray5 AT softhome DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:16 PM
Subject: DJGPP on win NT


> Dear DJGPP,
> In my C++ class at my highschool we run Windows NT 4.0 with the MS
> Visual C++ compiler. simply put, I hate it. so asked teach if I could use
> DJGPP, she said I could. so the next day I downloaded it (in 5 minutes via
a T1
> over a 10/100 LAN!!)then I got sysadim (teach) tomodify environment vars,
due
> to my simple user status.Then I made a simple prog that just displayed
"hello
> world", for tesing purposes. Compiling and linkingwent greatly but when I
tried
> to launch then dosshell from RHIDE  screen turned black and I had to click
"end
> task" to make it stop. I then tried to run the .exe file itself but
windows NT
> still did the same thing. The program will compile and run with MS visual
just
> fine, in the class we compile Windows console applications (32-bit DOS
extended
> progs. that require MS's 32 extender and woun't work w/out it.) Anything
that
> could point me in the right direction is highly appreciated.
>
>          Thank You Very Much,
>                  Peter Robbins
>
> In the *nix world there are only two e-mail programs, the rest are just
> modifications of, or front ends for those two.
>