Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:52:48 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Cesar Rabak <csrabak AT uol DOT com DOT br>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gdb 5.0 and yamd
In-Reply-To: <3A64E56A.F39D7E7E@uol.com.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010117135214.18768Q-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Cesar Rabak wrote:

> Does this version of gdb already includes the modifications needed by
> the yamd to check page protection?

No, it doesn't.  IIRC, the changes sent by Nate (I still have them,
just not handy where I type this) involved changing the libdbg.a
routines as well.  Since that's not done yet, the modifications to GDB
would be useless.

(Unfortunately, I don't have enough time lately to develop the DJGPP
port of GDB as well as I would like.  Volunteers are welcome to help.)

> Wishfully thinking, did anybody included similar mods in the
> ladybug/fsdb debuggers as well (I mean in the distribution files)?

FSDB doesn't seem to be maintained these days, unfortunately.  The
last changes were around v2.03 release, because changes in the library
broke something there.  But no new features were added in a very long
time...