From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10101170050.AA15172@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: dos memory fun
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:50:22 -0600 (CST)
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010116141517.4763F-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Jan 16, 2001 02:15:41 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> The OP indicated that using CWSDPR0 solved the problem.  How much less 
> low memory does CWSDPR0 use, approximately?

CWSDPR0 doesn't need to allocate the bitmap for swap file (which may be
up to 256Mb in size if disk allows) which could be 8Kb, and the code size
is about 1Kb smaller - so I expect a difference in less than 10Kb.