From: "Tonu Aas" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <9250eb$a84$00$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <557-Fri05Jan2001203419+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <936lkf$7mj$01$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <6137-Sat06Jan2001145950+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <937csu$pst$06$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> Subject: Re: Async COM managing Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:13:09 +0200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Lines: 15 Message-ID: <3a59a0af$0$189@diablo.uninet.ee> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.204.53.21 X-Trace: diablo.uninet.ee 978952367 189 194.204.53.21 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > The documentation is terse. But the PM-API is basically just a wrapper for > the VXD-to-VXD interface of VCOMM, which is documented better. > Constants can be looked up in the header files, ans structures are > declared there, too. > What I don't understand is why pointers are passed as 16:16 and not > 16:32? Could that mean buffers have to reside in low DOS memory? Maybe because PM-API and V86-API are the same. In VCOMM vxd DDB Entry they have same entry point. Somebody says that everything except receiving (or sending) data works ok even in V86 mode. Tõnu.